H.R. 622 and H.R. 232: Protecting Public Lands

Hunters, anglers, hikers, bird watchers, nature enthusiasts, there is a battle going on. And we need your help.

Header image credits: Aaron Maffei of Woods and Waves apparel 


If you’re anything like me, you love the fact that America has the greatest wild lands the world has to offer. If you’re also anything like me, you won’t let the government take them from you.

Public lands are gold mines. Whether it’s a vast stretch of prairie land, large trek of pristine forest, or a salt dusted marsh, the government can likely make money off it. Two recent bills are in the works right now to turn public lands from an American freedom staple to eventual government pocket money.

H.R. 622

H.R. 622 is coming off the heels of the recently reverted H.R. 621, which was also proposed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).  Although public out lash from hunters, anglers, and outdoorsman across the country led to Chaffetz pulling back H.R. 621, H.R. 622 is still alive and well.

H.R. 622, or the  Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act, moves to abolish Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and National Forest Service lands.

Here are some quick facts on the Bureau of Land Management and National Forest Service to put this in perspective.

The Bureau of Land Management manages over 245 million acres of public lands. In that land more than 3,000 species are managed, including some of our favorites (elk, mule deer, waterfowl), some of the scariest (grizzly bears, mountain lions, wolves), and some of the most vulnerable (sage grouse,  California condor, and kit fox). The BLM prides itself on manage some of the most integral public lands in America.

Meanwhile, the National Forest Service is comprised of National Forest and National Grasslands, encompassing a total of 193 million acres of American public land. At sites like the Bridger-Teton National Forest, you could walk for days, weeks, even months and not step on the same ground twice. Inside some National Forests, you can find marvelous National Monuments like the Giant Sequoia National Monument in California.

If H.R. 622 (which already has six cosponsors from California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah) is passed, then states will not be able to handle the burden of enforcing wildlife law on over 400 million acres of public land. Poaching, vandalism, illegal dumping, and destruction of public lands will all go unchecked. The consequences could be catastrophic for some of these fragile ecosystems.

A fine article written by Steven Rinella explains some of the motives, problems, and nuances of H.R. 622.


H.R. 232

H.R. 232, or the State National Forest Management Act of 2017, is another chip at the integrity of the National Forest System. If passed, the act will allow states to take as much as 2 million acres of National Forest service land and manage it for timber resources, or for “other uses”.

The bill was proposed by Alaskan congressman Don Young. Alaska’s National Forests include the Tongass National Forest (17 million acres) and Chugach National Forest, with the Tongass National Forest being the largest American forest by a 10 million acre lead. If Congressman Young cares that little about his own state’s national forests, which inhabit rare spectacle creatures such as brown bears and Alaskan moose, then he clearly has no care for the lower 48.

The biggest national forest in the lower 48 is the Humboldt-Toiyabe at 6 million acres. More typical National Forests include the Pisgah National Forest, 512 thousand acres, of North Carolina, and the Allegheny National Forest, 513 thousand acres, of Pennsylvania. Under H.R. 232, both of these National Forests could be completely transferred to state management for timber sale.

If Don Young wanting to take away century old hunting and fishing lands doesn’t piss you off enough, you should also note that he is an avid supporter of opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.


How To Protect Outdoorsman Heritage

Join me in shutting H.R. 622 and H.R. 232 down. We can’t let the government piss on our historic hunting, fishing, hiking, and natural lands. Follow these links to take action:


Back Country Hunters and Anglers:

Join Back Country Hunters and Anglers Against H.R. 622

Sign the Sportsman’s Pledge


Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership:

Oppose H.R. 622  

Top Ten Threats To Public Lands


Most of all, call your state congressman and let them know we will not stand for this!

2 thoughts on “H.R. 622 and H.R. 232: Protecting Public Lands

  1. We can see that the effort to repeal Obamacare was defeated by many normal people showing up at town halls and writing to Congress asking to protect health insurance. We must do the same thing to stop the selling off of our public lands. Lots of us persistently raising our voices. Remember, this whole sell off effort is being motivated by the Koch brothers who are obsessed with privatizing the public lands as a matter of libertarian principle. The public is strongly opposed but they have millions to spend on this. We will win.


    1. Happy find another organization fighting to keep public lands in the publics hands. Your website is very informative and has much to offer, thank you for reading my post and keep up the good work.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s